Clinical Validation

Evidence-Based IMRT Planning

Airato's dosimetric performance is characterized through internal validation studies and conference-presented dosimetric comparisons. This page collects the available clinical evidence for medical physicists conducting evaluation.

15+
IMRT cases in validation
3
Site types characterized
Evidence Overview

What Clinical Data Is Available

Dosimetric Benchmarks

Internal validation cohort results: DVH metrics, PQM scores, OAR dose comparisons across characterized treatment sites. Data without external peer review.

View benchmarks

Conference Presentations

Abstract presentations at Japan Society of Medical Physics and Asia-Pacific Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology annual meetings — dosimetric comparison methodology and preliminary results.

Site Validation Studies

Retrospective plan comparison studies conducted with participating radiation oncology departments. Plans re-optimized with Airato and compared to clinical-approved reference plans.

Medical physicist analyzing radiation treatment plan dosimetric data on dual monitors
Research & Presentations

Conference Abstracts & Presentations

Dosimetric comparison methodology and preliminary results presented at medical physics conferences. Journal submissions in preparation.

Conference Abstract
AI-Assisted Beam Angle Selection in Prostate IMRT: A Dosimetric Comparison with Manual Planning
Japan Society of Medical Physics Annual Meeting — 2024. Kimura Y, et al.
Conference Abstract
DVH-Constrained Multi-Criteria Optimization for Head-and-Neck IMRT: OAR Sparing Performance in a Retrospective Cohort
ASTRO Annual Meeting, Poster Session — 2024. Airato Clinical Team.
Internal Validation Report
Dosimetric Performance Characterization of Airato v1.2 — Prostate, Head-and-Neck, and Lung IMRT Sites
Airato Internal Report — December 2024. Available on request after NDA.
In Preparation
Clinical Validation of AI-Native IMRT Planning in a Japanese Academic Cancer Center: Retrospective Plan Comparison Study
Target journal: Japanese Journal of Medical Physics. Anticipated submission 2026.
Key Numbers

Dosimetric Benchmark Summary

Representative metrics from the internal validation cohort. Full benchmark tables on the dedicated page.

94.2
Plan Quality Metric score / 100

Internal validation cohort. Benchmark: institutional reference ≥85.

~8 Gy
Mean OAR dose reduction

vs. conventional planning for equivalent PTV coverage, validation cohort.

<3 min
Optimization time per plan

Standard 7-beam IMRT re-optimization on modern workstation hardware, warm-start from reference plan fluence.

View Full Benchmark Data

Request the internal validation report.

Full dosimetric characterization data available under NDA for qualified clinical evaluators.

Contact Clinical Team